Mostly the usual anti firearm agitprop except for this:
"But, the main issue is on the right to self-defend with a firearm.
The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights"
So they START from the point of view that the attackers rights up to and INCLUDING an apparent right to kill you is more important to YOUR right to pursue 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'.
It's really a Bizzaro world that these people live in isn't it? No wonder that they don't have the vaguest clue why 'normal' people don't want to go along with their brilliant 'plan'.
"A Revision on the Bill of Rights, Part III" (Huffington Post)